That's why Bent should have been there
But our lack of striker options were painfully apparent. Owen is taken off for 'tactical' reasons leaving Crouch on his own up front with no one to head the ball to. Walcot can't be brought on because an inexperienced player can't be risked on such a big occasion, so what's he doing there? So we go 4-4-1-1 and hang on for the victory. Now if Darren Bent had been there he could have complemented Crouch.
Then we bring on Owen Hargreaves. Pleeese! What does he do? Apart from one miss kick that exposes us to danger, nothing. Nothing comes of nothing.
Did you know that soccer is American football for fags. Well, according to this God fearing American Republican it is:
Soccah
It's actually a spoof - the Rapture index makes one suspicious - but it's a good parody.
1 Comments:
I can't believe that the poor second half was down to the heat apparently. You have to ask why is Walcott there when he can't be risked? Why is Lennon there when he can't be brought on for Beckham who was clearly out of puff second half? Whither Jenas? Its bizarre not to have taken both Bent and Judas ahead of Walcott and Jenas.
I still think we've got a good chance of winning but despite Sven not because of him.
Post a Comment
<< Home